New York raids RGGI coffers to pay down deficit
On Wednesday, New York lawmakers approved the transfer of $90 million of Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative ("RGGI") auction proceeds to help fill the state's $3.16 billion budget deficit. The move sets a very unfortunate precedent in the U.S. Fortunately, Canadian lawmakers appear intent on guarding against similar temptation in provincial climate change regimes.
Covering the power sector in 10 Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states, RGGI is the United States' first cap-and-trade system. The emission cap, which will decrease by 10% by 2018, is administered by distributing emissions allowances to regulated facilities. Nearly all allowances are auctioned, with the intention that proceeds will be reinvested by the participating states in efficiency, renewable energy, and other clean energy technologies. To date, New York has raked in almost $180.7 million from the sale of allowances under RGGI.
The legislature's decision this week to "re-purpose" these proceeds is unfortunate for at least three related reasons. First, the decision compromises part of the environmental and economic effectiveness of RGGI by halving the amount of RGGI dollars currently available for investment in clean energy and green jobs in the state. As a result, the decision also undermines a key justification for auctioning permits, instead of giving them away for free. Finally, by moving the proceeds into general revenue, the decision lends credence to the criticism that cap-and-trade systems are really cap-and-tax schemes.
New York may therefore have set a precedent that will not only undermine the effectiveness of RGGI, but could also be used to undermine efforts to pass similar cap-and-trade legislation in Washington.
Fortunately, Canadian lawmakers have been more savvy in anticipating the temptation of politicians to dip into funds generated by emission reduction regimes. Under Alberta's Specified Gas Emitters Regulation, regulated entities can comply with emissions targets by paying $15 per tonne into the Climate Change and Emissions Management Fund ("CCEMF"). However, the CCEMF is legally segregated from general revenue, is managed by an arm's length entity (the CCEMC), and may only be used to support climate change mitigation and adaptation projects in the province. The province therefore cannot reallocate that money without rewriting its emissions management laws.
Ontario's cap-and-trade regulation, which was passed this week, contains similar protections. The proceeds of any allowance auctions in Ontario will be designed as "money received for a special purpose" under the Financial Administration Act (Ontario) and will be segregated in a "Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account." Funds from the account will only be available for "costs incurred by the Crown in administering the regulations [...] that relate to greenhouse gases and in carrying out or supporting greenhouse gas reduction initiatives."
