Authors

Resources

Publications

Tags

RSS Feed

 RSS 2.0

Archives

Disclaimer

Davis LLP Web Logs or "Blogs" are intended to provide general comments on developments in the law. They are not intended to be a comprehensive review nor are they intended to provide legal advice. Readers should not act on information in the blogs without seeking specific advice on the particular matter. Please contact a lawyer listed on the blog pages for additional details, or to discuss how blog information is relevant to a specific situation.

Video Game Law Blog

» May, 2008

Germany becoming even stricter on Violence in Games

Submitted by Dr. Andreas Lober / Carine Neumüller, LL.M.

Germany has been known for strict legislation regarding violence in games for a long time, but recent changes will make live even harder for games companies.

According to the latest changes, media which predominantly contains exceptionally realistic, gruel and lurid images of violence as an end in itself is now indexed, i.e. subject to severe restrictions on distribution and advertising (new Section 15 of the Protection of Young Persons Act). For example, these games must not be sold to underage persons. This kind of media is indexed per se, i.e. it does not even have to assessed and rated by the supreme state authority which is generally responsible for indexing (the so-called “Bundesprüfstelle”).

Additionally, the supreme state authority now also has to index media which contain acts of violence like murder and mass killings as ends in themselves as well as media in which self-administered justice is presented as a successful and proven means for serving justice (new Section 18 of the Protection of Young Persons Act). This kind of media now has to be assessed, rated and put on a list of media which is generally considered as dangerous for young persons.

Unfortunately, the new law is not very precise and it is therefore open to various interpretations. However, many strategy games do contain scenes of mass killings or other scenes of violence but these games should clearly not be indexed (and generally have not been considered too problematic so far). Also, the new provisions of the Act will evidently lead to great legal uncertainty because nobody can really tell when a scene of violence is “exceptionally realistic” or just “realistic”.

Take Two sues the Chicago Transit Authority

Take Two has sued the Chicago Transit Authority after the CTA removed ads for Grand Theft Auto IV. The CTA's actions appear to have been a response to a Fox News reporter's on-air question about why the CTA was carrying the ads.

Coverage here (NBC).

Take-Two: The Hits Just Keep on Coming

Despite the fact that sales of their flagship franchise are smashing records this week, Take-Two is still embroiled in all kinds of legal troubles. It was recently revealed that another shareholder has filed a class action suit against the Take-Two board for their handling of the EA takeover bid. This is different than the suit we reported on a few weeks ago. This time, shareholder Michael Maulano accuses Take-Two of a breach of fiduciary duty, and providing "misleading and incomplete" information in its response to the bid. Its not clear how many other shareholders are involved, but Take-Two made the standard comment that the claims lack merit and that it intends to “vigorously defend against them.”

At the same time, Take-Two won a small victory in a separate class action filed in 2006 over whether the company lied about complying with the ESRB guidelines when submitting GTA: San Andreas for approval and misrepresented the company's stock option awards practices. US District Judge Shirley Wohl Kram held that the suit could go forward, but not with respect to the “Hot Coffee”/ESRB issue.

There are also rumours that the FTC is taking a closer look at the EA bid to see whether the proposed merger would trigger any anti-competition laws.

Coverage at GameDaily.

Submitted by Michael Mjanes