Authors

Resources

Tags

RSS Feed

 RSS 2.0

Archives

Disclaimer

Davis LLP Web Logs or "Blogs" are intended to provide general comments on developments in the law. They are not intended to be a comprehensive review nor are they intended to provide legal advice. Readers should not act on information in the blogs without seeking specific advice on the particular matter. Please contact a lawyer listed on the blog pages for additional details, or to discuss how blog information is relevant to a specific situation.

Family Law Blog

» british columbia

Capacity to marry and separate

The court in A.B. v. C.D., 2009 BCCA 200 considered the interesting question of mental capacity of a spouse required to form the necessary intention to separate or enter into marriage. The husband refused to accept that his wife wanted to divorce him. He argued that his wife suffered delusions about him, and as a result she lacked the intention to permanently separate. A party must intend to permanently separate in order to obtain a divorce, and there must be no reasonable prospect of reconciliation to trigger the application of legislation governing property division. To establish his claim that the wife was delusional, the husband wanted the wife to submit to a medical examination. His request was refused. The court held that the mental capacity required to form an intention to live separate and apart is equivalent to the capacity to marry. In each case, the capacity required is less than the degree of competency necessary for an individual to manage his or her own affairs or instruct counsel. Because the husband conceded his wife could manage her affairs and instruct counsel, the wife had the mental capacity to decide that she intended to permanently separate and live apart from him. Although it wasn't necessary for the wife to provide a rationale for her decision, the court also noted that she provided one: she was unhappy with the interactions between her and her spouse over many years, and was happy to be living apart from him.

The Role of a Parenting Coordinator in Family Law

Separation has an impact not only on parents, who must deal with the breakdown of the relationship, but also children. In some instances, conflict between parents continues long after the relationship breakdown and after intervention by the court. The negative impact on a child's emotional and psychological well-being of a failure on the part of parents to protect children from the parents' disputes is well documented by qualified professionals.
Parenting coordination is a child-focused process to assist families in addressing issues without repeated recourse to the court process and its associated financial costs. The goals of parenting coordination include to minimize further conflict and court appearances and provide assistance of a neutral, qualified decision maker who can resolve conflicts between the parents on parenting issues as they arise.
Parents involved in parenting coordination have usually entered into a separation agreement or obtained a court order dealing with custody, guardianship and access issues but continue to experience a high level of conflict. Parents can agree to retain a parenting coordinator or a court has discretion to order that the parties retain a parenting coordinator if it finds it is in the best interests of the child. The court may give directions regarding the mandate of the parenting coordinator and responsibility between the parents for the costs of the parenting coordinator.
The parenting coordinator is usually a qualified family law lawyer or mental health professional and is retained on an ongoing basis, often for one or two years. Either parent may contact the parenting coordinator if a dispute arises on a parenting issue. The parenting coordinator will listen to each parent and attempt to mediate a resolution to the dispute. If a mediated solution is not reached, then the parenting coordinator will make a decision.
Advantages of parenting coordination include the focus on the child in the decision making process, and the timely resolution of disputes. It can assist in implemention of and compliance with a parenting plan, and to help the parents communicate more effectively. The family benefits from the consistency provided by ongoing involvement of a single professional person with the family and the assistance of that professional to ensure protection of the child from the parents' disputes. Additional advantages include a reduction in the uncertainty and expense that often arises through the court process.

Negotiated family law settlements

The Supreme Court of Canada in a recent family law decision, Rick v. Brandsema, confirmed that the duties of spouses negotiating in the family law context differ from those that exist when negotiating a commercial contract between two parties of equal strength, including as family law negotiations take place in an emotionally charged matrimonial context. The husband in Rick v. Brandsema, who knew his wife was emotionally vulnerable and unstable, knowingly failed to disclose all relevant financial information to the wife when negotiating a settlement agreement relating to division of property following their marriage breakdown. The Supreme Court of Canada held that each spouse has a duty to make full and honest disclosure of all relevant financial information and to avoid exploitative tactics in the negotiation process, in order to protect the integrity of negotiations in the family law context. Where those duties are not met the agreement will in some circumstances be varied or set aside by the Court. Whether the Court will intervene in future to set aside or vary the agreement will depend on the circumstances of each case, including the nature of the non-disclosure, whether it was deliberate, and the extent to which the bargain struck between the parties fails to comply with the goals of the relevant legislation. The assistance of professionals, including lawyers or experts such as business valuators or accountants, can compensate for vulnerabilities of one spouse and reduce the risk that the Court will in future interfere with the agreement. The role of legal counsel in family law negotiations includes to advise each party regarding his or her duty to make or right to receive disclosure and the applicable legislative goals, and to assist in protecting a spouse from exploitative conduct or abuses in the negotiation process. In Rick v. Brandsema, the husband's misleading disclosure and his exploitation of his wife's emotional vulnerability were such that professional assistance could not adequately protect the wife's interests, and in those circumstances the agreement was set aside.