Lawyers in Canada: Davis LLP - Legal Advisors Since 1892

Hydro-Québec and Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada to launch Canada's largest all-electric vehicle pilot project in the fall of 2010

Today, Hydro-Québec and Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada Inc. (MMSCAN) announced the signature of a memorandum of understanding that will lead to the launch of Canada's largest all-electric vehicle pilot project this coming fall. In collaboration with the City of Boucherville, Hydro-Québec will test the performance of up to 50 Mitsubishi i-MiEVs, the vehicle which recently won the Japanese Car of the Year award for "Most Advanced Technology" at the Tokyo International Motor Show.

The project, which is evaluated at $4.5 million, aims to test the cars under a variety of road conditions, including those due to Québec's harsh winters and is designed to study the vehicles' charging behaviour, the driving experience and overall driver satisfaction. The project is the first of its kind to include the participation of a car manufacturer, a public utility, a municipality and local businesses that will integrate the vehicles into their existing fleets.

Thierry Vandal, Hydro-Québec's President and CEO declared "This new pilot project is part of our action plan for the electrification of vehicles [...] it will allow us to advance our knowledge of the technology and its integration into our grid, which in turn, will help us plan the necessary charging infrastructure for homes, offices and public places."

The City of Boucherville was selected as the project's host municipality given its proximity to Hydro-Québec's research institute (IREQ), its role in Hydro-Québec's upcoming interactive smart zone trial and the diversity of its local businesses. The availability of a local Mitsubishi dealership to oversee the i-MiEVs' maintenance was also part of the selection criteria.

i-MiEV, which stands for Mitsubishi Innovative Electric Vehicle, is an all-electric, highway-capable, charge-at-home commuter car. Because the battery, the motor and other items are mounted out of the way beneath the floor, the i-MiEV seats four adults and offers surprising interior room and cargo space. Other i-MiEV features include excellent low-speed acceleration and a very low centre of gravity, which contributes to superior handling and stability. Moreover, the i-MiEV is extremely quiet.

"We are very proud to be leading the way to a greener, more sustainable future by developing environment-friendly vehicles fuelled by clean, renewable energy," said Koji Soga, President and CEO of MMSCAN. "Mitsubishi is a leader in electric car development and the i-MiEV represents the pinnacle of our green technologies. In the same sense, Hydro-Québec and the City of Boucherville are demonstrating their environmental leadership by participating in this unique initiative."

The electric vehicle pilot project comes ahead of the government of Québec's soon to be released 2010-2015 Electric Vehicle Action Plan, announced in June 2009 and which is expected to include incentives to get electric vehicles on Québec's roadways, as well as for car and component manufacturers to establish themselves further in the province.

BC's Northwest Transmission Line Project to receive up to $130 million under the Green Infrastructure Fund

Almost one year ago, British Columbia Premier Gordon Campbell announced that the Province would start the environmental assessment process and First Nations consultation on the Northwest Transmission Line, which consists of a 287 kV line which would extend 335 kilometres into the Northwest portion of the province from Terrace to Meziadin Junction and north to Bob Quinn Lake.

The estimated $404 million project which is expected to be ready for construction in early 2010 has been given a serious boost as a result of yesterday's announcement by the federal government that it has been selected as a priority for funding of up to $130 million under the Green Infrastructure Fund, conditional upon the signing of a contribution agreement with the British Columbia government under the fund.

The Northwest Transmission Line will provide multiple benefits:

As the area surrounding the project has a significant potential to generate green power, local communities will be able to access clean electricity in the future, reducing their reliance on diesel generation and resulting greenhouse gas emissions. There is currently an estimated 2,000 MW of renewable energy in the area from small hydro, geothermal, wind and biomass sources and the project could immediately serve a number of potential generation projects representing approximately 500 MW being considered under British Columbia's current Clean Power Call.

The project also provides access to the electricity grid for potential customers, which in turn will support and promote economic diversification in the area. According to the Mining Association of BC, the project has the potential to attract $15 billion in new capital investments and create almost 11,000 jobs.

Lastly, construction of the transmission line will be a key step in a potential interconnection between southeast Alaska and the North American transmission grid via British Columbia.

The Harmonization of Climate Change

Since you've been waiting with bated breath to find out what we had to say next about the federal and provincial climate change policies, we didn't want to keep you in suspense. We blogged on Monday that the provinces are throwing together climate change legislation faster than you can say "greenhouse gases".

In related news, yesterday the Globe and Mail reported that the Alberta Conservatives are taking their federal counterparts to task over energy and environment, treatment of the oil sands and other federal government policies. The controversy arises after speaking notes prepared for Conservative MLAs to raise with federal MPs in their home ridings found their way into media hands.

A significant bone of contention for Alberta's governing party appears to be with respect to the federal government's climate change policies as they relate to coal-fired electricity. In a meeting with media on April 29, Minister Prentice was asked about what types of regulations Canada would be rolling out with respect to climate change, and specifically what its policy around thermal-coal would be. The Minister replied that any new coal-fired plants will have to be neutral in terms of emissions, (which means they must have the ability to inject the carbon dioxide at the source underground). He also indicated that once coal-fired electricity plants that have come to the end of their useful lives, and have been fully depreciated, they will be decommissioned and replaced with more environmentally friendly options.

Unfortunately, the announcement appears to have been the first time the information was relayed to Alberta. Why is this so significant for Alberta in particular? Alberta relies on coal for electricity. Virtually all of the country's 27 coal plants are here. We do not have hydro in Alberta and we rely only minimally on renewables, so thermal coal is rather important for keeping the lights on. A policy such as the one outlined by the Minister means that Alberta may "shoulder the biggest burden in complying with these regulations - and depending on how they are formulated, they could have a significant impact on the health of the provincial economy". Premier Stelmach may agree. He was quoted in the Globe article as saying "You cannot ask Albertans to carry the burden of equalization, and then also penalize them for producing the wealth that allows us to make such a massive contribution to the programs that Canadians enjoy".

While the Globe story points to the issue as being one of a frayed relationship between Alberta and Ottawa, really the problem is one of harmony of regulation, not relationship.

As Canadians, we are seeking solutions to climate change at the provincial level - this is good. But it's also challenging. Each province's emissions profile is different from the next and given its industry, Alberta's situation is particularly hard to address. Intraprovincial carbon trading, for example, is a desirable mechanism, but regulations in BC are so vastly different from those in Alberta or Ontario that they will be difficult to align. You could be trading apples for oranges. The longer the provinces have to grow and develop their own programs, the harder it's going to be to allow the various systems to operate in concert.

What will drive harmonization? Probably not climate change, but rather industry (national corporations are the same whether they are operating in PEI or Saskatchewan after all) and intra-provincial trade. Degrees of harmony have to be created.

We're just beginning to explore this topic here on the blog. Stay tuned to see our thoughts on how harmony will be achieved and how the constitutional issue will be addressed.

Ottawa's GHG offset system to include a "fast track" project approval system for first 6 months

submitted by Grant Boyle

On August 9 the federal government published a draft Guide for Protocol Developers for Canada’s Offset System for Greenhouse Gases. The draft Guide will undergo a 60 day consultation period before a final Guide is published. The Guide is intended to provide details on the requirements to complete an Offset System Quantification Protocol and the steps that must be followed to create offset credits under the federal GHG emissions framework.

Projects must take place in Canada, must have started on or after January 1, 2000, must be surplus to all legal requirements (federal, provincial/territorial and regional) and go beyond what is expected from the receipt of other climate change incentives (federal, provincial/territorial). Credits may be issued for reductions achieved after January 1, 2008.

The quantification requirements in the Guide are based on the ISO 14064 standard. The Guide does not provide or recommend an approach to quantify GHG reductions from specific project types and will rely on project proponents to develop and submit their own protocols to Environment Canada for approval, unless the protocol type has already been approved by the Ministry. The approvals process is expected to take 5-8 months.

During the first six months of the operation of the Offset System, Environment Canada will implement a modified and accelerated process to review and approve Offset System Quantification Protocols that are derived from a list of 40 “external protocols” from other systems, including: the Clean Development Mechanism, Alberta’s Specified Gas Emitters Regulation, the California Climate Action Registry, the Greenhouse Gas Abatement Scheme in New South Wales, France’s Offset System, and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. The Guide includes a proposed list of external protocols for “fast track” approval:

Agriculture
*Including Edible Oils in Cattle Feeding Regimes (Alberta)
*Reducing Days on Feed of Cattle (Alberta)
*Reducing the Slaughter Age of Cattle (Alberta)
*Anaerobic Decomposition of Agricultural Materials (Alberta)
*Livestock Project Reporting Protocol Capturing And Combusting Methane From *Manure Management Systems (California)
*GHG Emission Reductions From Manure Management Systems (CDM)
*Innovative Feeding Of Swine and Storing and Spreading of Swine Manure (Alberta)
*Tillage System Management (Alberta)

Energy Efficiency
*Waste Gas Or Waste Heat Or Waste Pressure Based Energy Systems (CDM)
*Residential Buildings (Alberta)
*Commercial Buildings(Alberta)
*Waste Heat Recovery Projects (Alberta)
*Waste Heat Recovery Project - Streamlined(Alberta)
*Energy Efficiency Projects (Alberta)

Forestry
*Afforestation Projects (Alberta)
*Forest Management (California)

Fossil Fuels
*Industrial Fuel Switching From Coal Or Petroleum Fuels To Natural Gas (CDM)
*Switching From Coal And/Or Petroleum Fuels To Natural Gas In Existing Power Plants For Electricity Generation (CDM)

Geological Sequestration
*Acid Gas Injection (Alberta)
*Enhanced Oil Recovery (Alberta)

Methane
*Landfill Gas Capture And Combustion (Alberta)
*Landfill Project Reporting Protocol Collecting And Combusting Methane From Landfills (California)
*Landfill Gas Project Activities (CDM)
*Coal Bed Methane, Coal Mine Methane And Ventilation Air Methane Capture And Use For Power (Electrical Or Motive) And Heat And/Or Destruction By Flaring Or Catalytic Oxidation (CDM)
*Aerobic Composting (Alberta)
*Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Projects (Alberta)
*Coalmine Methane and Abandoned Mine Methane Capture and Destruction Projects (General Electric AES)
*Waste Water Treatment Methane Capture and Destruction Projects (General Electric AES)

Renewable Energy
*Biomass to Energy from Biomass Combustion Facilities (Alberta)
*Electricity Generation From Biomass Residues (CDM)
*Run Of River Power Generation (Alberta)
*Solar Power Generation (Alberta)
*Wind Power Generation (Alberta)
*Introduction Of A New Primary District Heating System (CDM)
*Grid Connected Electricity Generation From Renewable Sources (CDM)

Transportation
*For Gravel And Lightly Surfaced Road Re-Surfacing Projects (Alberta)
*For Freight Modal Shifting (Alberta)

Waste
*Recovery & Utilization Of Gas From Oil Wells That Would Otherwise Be Flared (CDM)
*Non-Incineration Thermal Waste Management (Alberta)

Other
*Biofuels Productions And Usage (Alberta)
*Catalytic Reductions Ofn2o Inside The Ammonia Burner Of Nitric Acid Plants (CDM)

BC Hydro Announces 2007 Bioenergy RFEOI

In the first step towards a Bioenergy Call for Power, BC Hydro announced today that it is conducting a request for expressions of interest ("RFEOI") with regards to the use of wood fibre as a fuel source for power production in BC.  Although not a requirement for submitting an eventual bid, the RFEOI process does feed into the formation and drafting of the eventual call for power.  Now is the time to highlight concerns and interests.  

Interested parties can submit a RFEOI form which outlines a very high level business plan for producing Bioenergy.  This form asks interested parties to describe the company that would bid into the process, its major investors and to list some potential fuel sources.  These three issues alone of course raise a number legal issues regarding the appropriate corporate structure to use, efficient tax planning, contracting with fuel suppliers, whether or not an enviornmental assessment is required, what other permits are required, whether to look for private equity funding or to seek debt financing and whether to build a new plant or expand an existing one - which of course leads to more legal issues and so forth.  Although BC Hydro and the Minister of Forests have compiled information on Pine Beetle wood fuel supplies , they are not offering any advice on the above issues. 

The deadline for submission of RFEOI's is the 17th of April, and there will be an information session in Prince George, BC on the April 3rd.  In the meantime, there are a lot of issues to start considering.